View Single Post
Old 02-24-2013, 12:23 AM   #1
Cosmic201
Hall-of-Famer
 
Cosmic201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Baton Rouge
Age: 29
Posts: 2,892
Cosmic201 is a true SaintCosmic201 is a true SaintCosmic201 is a true SaintCosmic201 is a true Saint
Cosmic201 is a true SaintCosmic201 is a true SaintCosmic201 is a true SaintCosmic201 is a true SaintCosmic201 is a true Saint
Thread Starter
SC Gov. pushes to limit food stamp purchases to healthy items.

COLUMBIA: Haley pushes to limit food stamp purchases to healthy items | Politics | The State

Quote:
South Carolina, long at the back of the line in health care, wants to take the lead among states in the battle against obesity by allowing only healthy foods to be purchased with food stamps.

Gov. Nikki Haley on Thursday joined leaders of three state agencies to announce plans to seek a waiver from the federal government to change the food stamp program. Haley noted that South Carolina has the eighth highest rate of obesity among states.

Read more here: COLUMBIA: Haley pushes to limit food stamp purchases to healthy items | Politics | The State



So the question I pose you folks is; agree or disagree? Why?




Personally I think we can ban certain types of foods from being purchased with food stamps easily without breaking any real issues.
I would ban the purchase of chips, soda's, candies.


I think that is a common sense solution that doesn't go into landmine issues.
Cosmic201 is offline Reply With Quote


1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.