Cubfan
12-28-2006, 07:39 PM
SAN FRANCISCO -- Major League Baseball's players union said Thursday it would challenge a federal appeals court's decision to give prosecutors access to the names and urine samples of about 100 players who tested positive for steroids in 2003.
Barry Bonds' attorney downplayed the significance of a court ruling Wednesday allowing federal investigators access to confidential MLB drug-testing data from 2003.
Donald Fehr, executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association, said if Wednesday's decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals "is allowed to stand, it will effectively repeal the Fourth Amendment for confidential electronic records."
Fehr said he was consulting with union attorneys to "determine what our next step should be in our fight to protect the constitutional rights, including the basic right to privacy, of our members."
Story continued here! (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2710788)
Seriously, if your members are breaking federal law you do not get privacy rights. It's the same as them doing any other illegal drug.
Anyone else got an opinion on this?
Barry Bonds' attorney downplayed the significance of a court ruling Wednesday allowing federal investigators access to confidential MLB drug-testing data from 2003.
Donald Fehr, executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association, said if Wednesday's decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals "is allowed to stand, it will effectively repeal the Fourth Amendment for confidential electronic records."
Fehr said he was consulting with union attorneys to "determine what our next step should be in our fight to protect the constitutional rights, including the basic right to privacy, of our members."
Story continued here! (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2710788)
Seriously, if your members are breaking federal law you do not get privacy rights. It's the same as them doing any other illegal drug.
Anyone else got an opinion on this?