eaux-yeah
02-23-2007, 02:37 PM
Sweet, a place to start a BSD thread!!
:jump:
I'm ALWAYS pegged as a Linux 'zealot', 'fan-boy', 'excessive compusilve?',etc. you get the point.
Don't get me wrong, I love Linux and think it is one of the best Desktop solutions. Been using it almost since it's conception. But BSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD in particular, is what I use for ALL of my server solutions, if possible. OpenBSD for the public side and NetBSD for the internal side. OpenBSD is my numero uno favorite by a few miles.
Why did I leave FreeBSD out of this?
IMHO, FBSD has slowly become what they hated, fragmented. Yes, ALL FBSD code still originates from a centralized source, but the quality of source code auditing has drastically degraded over the years. I understand that is going to happen as the tree grows. Still good, but nothing compared to O/NBSD. FreeBSD 6.* is a much better improvement over the severely broken version 5 and is a very solid system and has a boat load of packages in it's ports tree, for sure. I KNOW you FBSD users will disagree with my comments, let's here it.
Not going to mention Darwin, I'm a BSD nut, that's blasphemy. :hihi:
HERE is a great link that details some history and describes the different BSD variants. Too bad they didn't add Dragonfly, very unique clustering ideas coming out of that camp.
http://networking.ringofsaturn.com/Unix/bsd.php
Anyone notice all of BSD information being released from IBM lately? and not bad info, either!
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-openbsd.html
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-netbsd.html
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/os-freebsd
:jump:
I'm ALWAYS pegged as a Linux 'zealot', 'fan-boy', 'excessive compusilve?',etc. you get the point.
Don't get me wrong, I love Linux and think it is one of the best Desktop solutions. Been using it almost since it's conception. But BSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD in particular, is what I use for ALL of my server solutions, if possible. OpenBSD for the public side and NetBSD for the internal side. OpenBSD is my numero uno favorite by a few miles.
Why did I leave FreeBSD out of this?
IMHO, FBSD has slowly become what they hated, fragmented. Yes, ALL FBSD code still originates from a centralized source, but the quality of source code auditing has drastically degraded over the years. I understand that is going to happen as the tree grows. Still good, but nothing compared to O/NBSD. FreeBSD 6.* is a much better improvement over the severely broken version 5 and is a very solid system and has a boat load of packages in it's ports tree, for sure. I KNOW you FBSD users will disagree with my comments, let's here it.
Not going to mention Darwin, I'm a BSD nut, that's blasphemy. :hihi:
HERE is a great link that details some history and describes the different BSD variants. Too bad they didn't add Dragonfly, very unique clustering ideas coming out of that camp.
http://networking.ringofsaturn.com/Unix/bsd.php
Anyone notice all of BSD information being released from IBM lately? and not bad info, either!
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-openbsd.html
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-netbsd.html
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/os-freebsd