What Joe Vitt said about Cameron Jordan earlier is that he is enthusiastic and he is improving with every practice and the game last week. He has to go up against Carl Nicks in reps - and that he will not have to face players as big as Nicks in the games.
What Joe Vitt said about Cameron Jordan earlier is that he is enthusiastic and he is improving with every practice and the game last week. He has to go up against Carl Nicks in reps - and that he will not have to face players as big as Nicks in the games.
He was talking about Sed Ellis, not Cameron Jordan.
Let me preference my comment by saying that I do not care about positive reps or negative reps. I do, however, want to point out how silly it can be at times.
It would be really helpful if those so interested in neg-repping a post would respond to the post to point out the problems with it. I corrected a poster who mistakenly thought that Joe Vitt was referencing Cam Jordan when the California kid he was talking about was Sed Ellis. Ellis, unlike Jordan, has started; Vitt talked about a player who has started from 'day 1' and has gotten better each year. That cannot be Jordan, who is a rookie with no experience much less starting experience. I think the first poster--through no fault of his own--heard California kid with a smile and thought Jordan. Ryan and Kirwan, I believe, may have intended for Vitt to discuss Jordan and they actually came back to him after Vitt finished discussing Ellis. But Vitt apparently thought they were talking about Ellis. Jordan plays on the outside and is not the player going up against Jahri Evans and Carl Nicks every day in practice. If pointing this out is neg-worthy, then that's kind of silly.
Linear Mode
