 |
|
 |
 |
Sponsored Ads
|
|
07-15-2012, 06:29 PM
|
#16
|
|
Hall-of-Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,991
|
thanks Beast. I figured more people would chime in.
|
|
|
07-15-2012, 06:43 PM
|
#17
|
|
Super Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SE, Louisiana
Age: 47
Posts: 5,582
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IntenseSaint
10 of 10. Don't need news sites to tell me about the law. Have read it myself.
|
You read the whole bill?
Why did you do that?
__________________
Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your fellow Americans.
www.christmasjars.com
|
|
0 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
|
07-15-2012, 07:54 PM
|
#18
|
|
Ragin Rukus
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abbeville, LA
Age: 29
Posts: 6,839
|
10/10. I is smart!
|
|
|
07-15-2012, 08:04 PM
|
#19
|
|
Allons à Lafayette
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 8,273
|
10/10, though I thought the questions suggested the answers and I did not read the bill.
|
|
|
07-15-2012, 08:59 PM
|
#20
|
|
Very Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 620
|
0 of 0. I don't care about a quiz.
|
|
0 out of 3 members found this post helpful.
|
07-15-2012, 10:21 PM
|
#21
|
|
3rd World & Proud
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Somewhere In Time
Posts: 672
|
I got better than 40% blindly answering yes to every question...
__________________
|
|
|
07-16-2012, 12:52 AM
|
#22
|
|
Ragin Rukus
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abbeville, LA
Age: 29
Posts: 6,839
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffin-Long
I got better than 40% blindly answering yes to every question...
|
You could've gotten better than 50% blindly answering no to every question.
|
|
3 out of 3 members found this post helpful.
|
07-16-2012, 04:18 PM
|
#23
|
|
Very Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Terrace
Age: 30
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brockmeaux
You could've gotten better than 50% blindly answering no to every question.
|
Actually that gives me 36%. (so does all yes's at this point)
That's because the percentile is a comparison to other people, the majority of which obviously got more than half the questions right
The numbers for yes and no are the same, because the correct answers are 5 yes and 5 no
:math:
|
|
1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-16-2012, 05:33 PM
|
#24
|
|
Ragin Rukus
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abbeville, LA
Age: 29
Posts: 6,839
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
Actually that gives me 36%. (so does all yes's at this point)
That's because the percentile is a comparison to other people, the majority of which obviously got more than half the questions right
The numbers for yes and no are the same, because the correct answers are 5 yes and 5 no
:math:
|
I was talking about his total accuracy score and not his in-relation-to score, but your math is spot-on. Good catch.
|
|
|
07-16-2012, 05:48 PM
|
#25
|
|
The Listener
Join Date: Dec 2002
Age: 50
Posts: 3,840
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brockmeaux
You could've gotten better than 50% blindly answering no to every question.
|
It doesn't matter who they say is covered or not covered. Illegal aliens will still go to some hospital if need be and we will still pay for it, as we will those that are now uninsured. It won't suddenly become cheaper nor will anyone that is now sponging off of the system suddenly become a contributor. It is just cost shifting. If anyone that now buys insurance thinks they will get a better plan or a cheaper one because of this you are delusional no matter what bill of goods some liberal foundation trys to sell you.
__________________
As Breesus said while hovering over the latest vanquished foe..." I am life, I am death, I will steal your final breath"
|
|
0 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
|
07-16-2012, 08:28 PM
|
#26
|
|
Patriotic Sin Pillows
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Redneck Riviera
Age: 45
Posts: 18,059
Thread Starter
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearze34
It doesn't matter who they say is covered or not covered. Illegal aliens will still go to some hospital if need be and we will still pay for it, as we will those that are now uninsured. It won't suddenly become cheaper nor will anyone that is now sponging off of the system suddenly become a contributor. It is just cost shifting. If anyone that now buys insurance thinks they will get a better plan or a cheaper one because of this you are delusional no matter what bill of goods some liberal foundation trys to sell you.
|
I don't think you know what you're talking about.
Here's my understanding and you're welcome to correct me if I'm wrong.
Currently, we have a small group policy that is asinine expensive. last I looked my healthy family of 3 is about $1400 per month. The group is less than 10 people with some old and some as young as 26. Others in groups pay far, far less. For instance, my friend sitting here now works for a local hospital and the total cost of his policy is $660. The employer pays for him and half the family.
If the exchanges are what they're supposed to be then us small business people who are currently being abused would be able to insure our folks for much less than we can now.
How's that a bad thing?
__________________
"America has only three cities: New York, San Francisco, and NEW ORLEANS. Everywhere else is Cleveland."- Tennessee Williams
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 11:05 AM
|
#27
|
|
I'm a beast.. :shrug:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Parts Unknown
Age: 35
Posts: 11,738
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearze34
It doesn't matter who they say is covered or not covered. Illegal aliens will still go to some hospital if need be and we will still pay for it, as we will those that are now uninsured. It won't suddenly become cheaper nor will anyone that is now sponging off of the system suddenly become a contributor. It is just cost shifting. If anyone that now buys insurance thinks they will get a better plan or a cheaper one because of this you are delusional no matter what bill of goods some liberal foundation trys to sell you.
|
That won't change until the EMTALA is repealed.. 30+ votes to repeal Obamacare in the House but not a peep about Reagan's EMTALA, which requires hospitals to treat patients with "emergency conditions" regardless of whether they can pay or if they're even a citizen..
|
|
1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-17-2012, 11:09 AM
|
#28
|
|
Very Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Terrace
Age: 30
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beast
That won't change until the EMTALA is repealed.. 30+ votes to repeal Obamacare in the House but not a peep about Reagan's EMTALA, which requires hospitals to treat patients with "emergency conditions" regardless of whether they can pay or if they're even a citizen..
|
A hospital should just let someone die if they don't have money? Or if they don't have their papers on them, just let 'em bleed out?
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 11:44 AM
|
#29
|
|
Super Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DFW
Age: 25
Posts: 6,241
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
A hospital should just let someone die if they don't have money? Or if they don't have their papers on them, just let 'em bleed out?
|
Absolutely. My money is worth far more than your life.
(see your name for my tone :P)
|
|
|
07-19-2012, 11:32 AM
|
#30
|
|
We have Melvin Williams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Orleans
Age: 29
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
A hospital should just let someone die if they don't have money? Or if they don't have their papers on them, just let 'em bleed out?
|
I think by putting the 'emergency conditions' in quotes was more of a tribute to people going to the ER for common ailments and not actual life threatening conditions.
I missed 2 on the quiz.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
-->
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.
|
| | | |