- Moderator
- #1
Online
He got another year plus an option. Why not drive his value higher and get something better in return next year. Cooks wouldn't sabotage his value(Besides his vocal displeasure).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And any of that is true or all libel?Not if he wants out. He's already shown that he will do **** to divide the locker room. Do you want to risk wasting a year with a poisoned locker room because you're too attached to a guy with great speed who wants out?
Not if he wants to get paid. If he was on a 2nd deal, then I'd be right there with you saying we gotta get what we can and cut bait.Not if he wants out. He's already shown that he will do **** to divide the locker room. Do you want to risk wasting a year with a poisoned locker room because you're too attached to a guy with great speed who wants out?
Fallacious reasoning, his trade value is in all probability higher now. Rookie contract, a year younger. Not to mention the risk of injury and more public signs of dissatisfaction.
I am not saying we should trade him now, just that his value is probably higher this year than next
Another year older, more wear and tear on the body? No thanks. If you trade him, now is the opportune time. Don't want to trade him, but if he doesn't want to be here, then you have to get 1st round value while we can.He got another year plus an option. Why not drive his value higher and get something better in return next year. Cooks wouldn't sabotage his value(Besides his vocal displeasure).