One good thing to consider about our "Need" position (1 Viewer)

David Robbins

Ole Miss Rocks!
Joined
Mar 30, 2001
Messages
27,895
Reaction score
4,522
Age
60
Location
Jackson, MS
Offline
WR. Everyone (including me) considered this still a very large need coming into this draft. I am dissappointed we didn't go after Van Jefferson or one of the other young receivers. However, I still remember how good Emmanuel Butler looked in games last pre-season. Harris also looked good at times at WR as well. It's not like we don't have options. Plus, we did bring in Sanders in Free-agency. So, it's not a total loss.
 
The draft is never perfect. But I would like another receiver to compete. Sanders is a good additions but temporary. Smith is someone that no one could figure out. He showed, at times, he could be a huge contributor. But then he disappear or not in the game plan the next time. It is just weird.
 
WR. Everyone (including me) considered this still a very large need coming into this draft. I am dissappointed we didn't go after Van Jefferson or one of the other young receivers. However, I still remember how good Emmanuel Butler looked in games last pre-season. Harris also looked good at times at WR as well. It's not like we don't have options. Plus, we did bring in Sanders in Free-agency. So, it's not a total loss.

Thomas (top 1-2 WR in the game)
Sanders (the perfect #2)
Tre’quan (played well when healthy, and he’s just a 3)
Harris (secret weapon, ready to explode)
Hogan (physical blocker, big body)

Young, lots of talent
Butler
Humphrey

I really don’t get why some think it’s a need.
Please show me another team with a better 1-5 WR roster.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom