- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 49,117
- Reaction score
- 77,835
Online
And I do snark. It's as much my default as is sarcasm.Lol and so much more. Shock just plays contrarian, it’s what he does.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And I do snark. It's as much my default as is sarcasm.Lol and so much more. Shock just plays contrarian, it’s what he does.
i concurOne's a city. One's a continent.
Those restrictive drug laws are working so great for us here in America right? LolNah, this is a fake argument by people who don't want real change. We've got restrictive gun laws in Australia and haven't had a school shooting in....ever? And we've hardly had any mass shootings (defined as 3+ victims) since 1996. There's ample evidence available to show the benefit of restrictive laws. The "but the criminals won't abide by them" argument is a nonsense, respectfully.
25 year prison sentences are for felons who are a danger to the community. This guy isn't. He is never going to make the mistake of following someone who bumps into him ever again. 5 years is plenty given Will Smith's role in his death...sadly he doesn't get to learn from his mistake...Someone will have to explain this one to me, because I'm lost.
Supreme Court vacates conviction of man who shot and killed former Saint Will Smith
In 2016, Cardell Hayes was convicted of manslaughter in the fatal shooting of retired New Orleans Saints defensive leader Will Smith. Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the decision.sports.yahoo.com
In 2016, Cardell Hayes was convicted of manslaughter in the fatal shooting of retired New Orleans Saints defensive leader Will Smith. Monday, the U.S. Supreme ...
I do too.I certainly hope you're wrong.
Thought you couldn't be tried for the same crime twice?
25 year prison sentences are for felons who are a danger to the community. This guy isn't. He is never going to make the mistake of following someone who bumps into him ever again. 5 years is plenty given Will Smith's role in his death...sadly he doesn't get to learn from his mistake...
25 year prison sentences are for felons who are a danger to the community. This guy isn't. He is never going to make the mistake of following someone who bumps into him ever again. 5 years is plenty given Will Smith's role in his death...sadly he doesn't get to learn from his mistake...
Is he a threat to society? Can he do, will he do good for the community if his sentence was converted to 25 years community service, whatever that might be? This would afford him the opportunity to raise his child into being a positive contributor to the community, preventing this child from growing up resentful and becoming part of the problem. This would afford him the ability to speak on the subject of being a responsible gun owner, to make amends for making a bad decision.So two guys have guns in their cars. The guy who didn't get out with a gun gets killed. The one who did get out with a gun gets 5 years.
Will Smith could have handled things differently and de-escalated the situation and nobody dies.So two guys have guns in their cars. The guy who didn't get out with a gun gets killed. The one who did get out with a gun gets 5 years.
Will Smith could have handled things differently and de-escalated the situation and nobody dies.
Is he a threat to society? Can he do, will he do good for the community if his sentence was converted to 25 years community service, whatever that might be? This would afford him the opportunity to raise his child into being a positive contributor to the community, preventing this child from growing up resentful and becoming part of the problem. This would afford him the ability to speak on the subject of being a responsible gun owner, to make amends for making a bad decision.
Intent to kill wasn't there, a bad decision led to him having to defend himself...Will Smith certainly could have made better decisions as well.
Plessy v. Ferguson, which was the preeminent SCOTUS case based around a biracial street car passenger who refused to give up his seat in New Orleans to protest La. segregated seating regulation law, was taken to the Supreme Court and who upheld "separate but equal" clause which was derived from a narrowing interpretation of the 13th and 14th Amendments. This landmark legal decision, affirmed many Southern states already pre-existing laws enacted during Reconstruction to limit the freedoms, like right to vote, right to assembly, in certain cases, some forms of freedom of speech and grandfather clause exemptions and Plessy/Ferguson also set the template for state-sanctioned segregation laws in all facets of public sphere for the next 100 years, until it was legally thrown out and delegitimized by Brown vs Board of Education and began to be politically or federally enforced in late 1950's/early-mid 1960's increasingly.There are exceptions, but they rarely take away liberties. I will admit a few amendments are a punching bag for them but outside of the 4th, most of the criminal justice amendments / original text are pretty well upheld.
Prior to the 50s, yeah... there are a lot of ugly rulings. But since then it's been fair.
I've seen people in New Orleans get anywhere from a 6 to a 12 years sentence for manslaughter and they only serve half of that . I wouldn't expect for the DA to pursue another trial in this case. Additionally, there is no way he gets a fair trial in New Orleans.
Well you said your friend was in the car behind Will Smith, Cordell Hayes jumped out of the car behind Will Smith’s.No way! There was another car with Will Smith. From what I heard they instigated allot of this. It’s 2 twins that always had the reputation for starting trouble. Sucks