Loki Disney Plus - Trailer (6 Viewers)

Oh, I forgot about this and it's technically not about Loki but I'm putting it here anyway. Julia's character Val is looking like she will be a good guy. The reason? She was seen using an iphone and apparently while Apple has no issues with their phones being used in tv and movies, they will not allow a villain to be seen using them. So the fact that Val is seen using one means she can't be a villain. There were other examples but the only one I remember is Sharon Carter, she was seen using some other type of phone. Edit: Just remembered one, there was a movie, don't remember the name but it involved a murder, where the person behind the murder was the only character not seen using an iphone during the movie.
 
Last edited:
Do they not age when pruned? I guess I thought that once they went to wherever they ended up when pruned they would continue aging, but thinking about it, they didn't.

That said, you're right, I don't think Sylvie was ever pruned until the moment did it to herself. She was hiding out for a while, right?

I thought she had been hiding for ages. Like she said her timeline was pruned even before Loki was born. Loki is old. Why isn't she a grandma Loki?
 
Loki and Thor are around 1500 years old. Presumably Sylvie has been on the run a similar amount of time.
 
So how is Kang so powerful as just a regular human? Does he have powers? Is he just so smart that he's that darned good?

Kang's real name(in the comics) is Nathaniel Richards, he's the descendant of Reed Richards from Fantastic Four who resides in the 31st Century. Who knows if they change it for the MCU though. He's so powerful that the Avengers teamed up with Thanos to stop him at some point and Kang just kicked the crap out of them. Everything that has happened till this point in the MCU has only happened because Kang has allowed it to happen.
 
I went full Loki and ordered me these today lol...



I have this Loki shirt I’d bought a while back

“No Hulks Allowed” 😂

Amazon product ASIN B07DPT1WSM
 
He Who Remains supposedly paved the way for Sylvia and Loki to end up where they did. One who can’t trust and one who can’t be trusted - both the god or goddess of mischief. And he knew what would happen b/c of his knowledge of the timeline. So even though he painted himself as benevolent, could he actually be considered as evil/bad for the way the events played out?
 
It just struck me:
Both WandaVision and FATWS had definite "wrap up" endings, even though both hinted at things that are upcoming.

How extremely appropriate is it for the series whose main character is the G-d of Mischief to end on an unresolved cliffhanger?

Mischief indeed.
 
I think the most important thing to remember is in the comics there is a Kang variant in the Spider Ham universe who is a kangaroo called Kangaroo the Conquerer, and I feel like there's a not zero chance we see that in live action.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom