Calls for an "immediate impact" at CB through the draft. Do they make sense?

i dont know what is the problem all about. revis , hall , ross all had a bunch of playing time and solid impact last year .... its not that these guys are complete bums their first 2-3 years . i always believe the best learning for a DB is to making mistakes on gameday sometimes.

Noones saying they are complete bums and noones saying a CB we pick will be one either. But with our depth at CB currently, a rookie is going to struggle to win a starting job as a nickel or dime back, much less beating out David and Gay for the 2nd CB's spot in TC. The whole point was to swing for the fences if we pick a CB and get the guy with the highest ceiling. We aren't in desperate need for a CB to come in and start from day one so we can afford to go BPA if we pick CB (or any position for that matter).