Moral Relativism

I guess I have always been something of an ethical relativist Jim. I have a concept of a somewhat normative ethic. My idea of morality is that it is guided by times less principles, but the application of those principals can change from time to time. My moral system, such as it is, is based on what is at the core of what it means to be human. IMO, the core of our humanity is freedom/liberty so what is moral is what increases individual freedom/liberty. What that is can change over time.

But, then again, I don't necessarily think that is a moral absolute. What I do think is that when it comes to morality, it's important to base it on something that will make people want to follow that morality. Otherwise, no one will follow it and what would be the point?