No , the point , which you've missed , is that I don't know what happened , and I'd like to before I make a judgement . I clearly portrayed two scenarios and declared the likelyhood of the truth being between them . Agenda much ?
I have no agenda at all. You really shouldn't accuse people of things with no evidence. It makes all of your other arguments look weaker. I'm a Saints fan, why would I have an agenda against one of our best players?
No one here hopes that Vilma is innocent more than I do. However, quite a few of the people on this forum decided he was clearly innocent, or victimized by the police, or that reckless endangerment is "no big deal" just because he is a Saint.
In my opinion, that's no better than those who are ready to crucify him because of one vaguely described incident. When people make up their minds before they get the facts, it rarely makes for a good situation.