Triplett says Saints Interest in Chris "Beanie" Wells is "Bona Fide"

Danchrism said
1) If you knew you never posted a highlight video to augment your point, why did you feel as though I was talking about you? If anything, I was AGREEING that the discourse of for/against Wells has gone full sphere at this point.
2) I don't mention my status as a moderator, you did. And whether you were being sarcastic or not, I do have a solid posting history around here. I just happen to not agree that Wells is the best selection for the Saints at 14. There have been good and bad posts on both sides of the spectrum; the loudest drum-bangers happen to be the bad-against side. Again, if you're solidly backing your points, you have nothing to worry about; this is how discourse takes place. If you're not solidly backing your points, they'll get eaten up... and you'll have to resort to highlight videos and rhetoric.
3) "Cooler?" Really? I remember that as being a joke we laughed about. No further discussion...
4) You're implying, via sarcasm, that my exceptional posts on a message board are indicative of my abilities in the classroom. Since you're actually intoning that my posts are not exceptional, the parallel suggests that my time as a student at Morehouse was not exceptional as well. Knowing the circumstances surrounding my leaving there, I would not have expected you to take it there - but you did, for reasons I can't understand.

99) Let's move this back to Beanie or no Beanie, if you want to discuss this any further, I have 200+ PMs available

1. Your response was to my post and you clearly outlined your post in such a way as to show a lack of sound reasoning on the part of those who make arguments for Wells versus the do-not-draft-Wells coalition who do not make reaching arguments.

2. I mentioned your status as a moderator only because I questioned your insight. If I am questioning the insight of a regular poster, there's no fear of retribution in the form of being banned. Of course, the same is/should be true with you even as a moderator though you could very easily look to exert your authority. Obviously, the moderator line is sarcastic but does show that the fact that you are a moderator is not ignored on my part when making various statements in reference to you.

3. A joke is one thing, a belief is another. We shared a laugh because it was a joke just as saying that your willingness to disregard my arguments must be due to that same joke. That said, when you continously run into a curious case of impertinence, you are left to wonder.

4. It is unfortunate that you think that my reference to Morehouse is somehow a reference to the circumstances for which you left Morehouse. My reference, clearly rife with sarcasm, was nothing different than my saying you're a rocket scientist or a Harvard grad. As an individual who has gone to Morehouse, I knew you could relate more to the Morehouse reference and not be lost on its place amongst the upper echelon of academia. If I had spoken with another individual who is not familiar with Morehouse's academic success, I might have used a separate institution. That said, I know that intention rarely equals outcome. I can be the bigger the person and apologize in that regard only because I did not intend to offend your sensbilities in regard to your grandmother's continuing battle with cancer. Just as much as you are appalled or bewildered about where you think I went, I am just as dismayed as well as disappointed by your persuasion that I would stoop so low. That said, I hope we can move on from this unfortunate exchange.

99. I am through with the Beanie discussion. As I have said before, there's nothing else to be said on the subject that has not already been said time and time again.