"We’re still trying to figure out who was the aggressor,” Buschow said."
I guess I'm trying to figure out why you think the 65 year old was the aggressor? And even if he was, does that justify maiming?
I heard an eyewitness interview today who said the pro-plan guy walked across the street to the anti-plan side and started the argument. He then picked out the weakest looking person there(the 65 year old) to continue the argument. Not sure how the 65 year old could be considered an aggressor under those circumstances. :idunno:
And he's a victim because it was his finger bitten off.