What is the contact information for the NFL league office?

I read about 90% of that legal pdf....and unfortunately I cant get behind this.

The MN boys arent getting off because they are from MN they are getting of because MN drug testing laws are different.

How can you suggest that 3 guys from LA should be able to violate Drug Testing contracts but the rest of the population in the entire state has to abide by them.

Seems to me your sense of entitlement is mightly skewed by the desired outcome that appears unfair on the surface.

While I disagree with the way the NFL handled the knowledge of the Butameth....chemical that portion of the ruling was upheld for all 5 players.

But are not all players of all teams considered employed by the NFL and not their respective teams? Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I thought that all players were basically considered "contract workers" for the National Football League? If that's the case, shouldn't all the players be subject to drug testing rules of the locality of their "employer"? If not, then what's to stop a state from passing some bogus law allowing use of POD's for "professional" athletes? Sure, it's far fetched and even a bit silly, but, c'mon? Are, say, GM employees in Detroit tested or treated any differently than GM employees in Tennessee?

Just wonderin' while I'm wanderin'...

MG