http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/opinion/02brooks.html
Kinda going further with what he said. I have always tended to think that they
do have some undue influence on politics. It stems from the mere fact that those in power (on both the right and the left) PERCEIVE them to have such influence, and seeing as perception often times means reality to people, they inadvertently allow this niche group to influence decision making and
occasionaly influence outcomes and discourse. Simply because people in power believe they command more power than they actually do.
It's sorta what he says and I think there is a lot of truth to what he says.
So whats the EEs thoughts on this one?