Obama Defies Pessimists as Rising Economy Converges With Stocks

It's actually the opposite. And I don't think the bailout companies are allowed to "play" the stock market with their bailout monies.

That chart is a bit misleading when you account for the volume coming from High Frequency Trading.

From January 27, 2010 (so it's recent):

http://www.tradersmagazine.com/news/high-frequency-trading-stocks-volume-104994-1.html

The number of high-frequency trading firms continues to grow, but the volume of shares traded by the important group is waning.

That's the conclusion of a group of exchange executives who derive at least half of their volume from high-frequency trading shops.

"I'm signing account documents at a record pace," Paul Adcock, an NYSE Euronext executive vice president who heads operations at NYSE Arca, told attendees at a recent industry conference. "But those types of accounts struggle when the VIX is where it is."

"High-frequency trading is not going to go away anytime soon," Brian Hyndman, a Nasdaq OMX senior vice president responsible for transaction services, said at the same conference. "But it is no longer in the growth stage. We are probably mid-field." About 55 percent of Nasdaq's volume comes from high-frequency trading firms, Hyndman said, with the amount dependent on the level of the VIX.

Take out 55% of the volume, and what would that chart look like?

Yes, the article quotes Nasdaq numbers, but DJIA numbers are about the same.