We've gone over this before over and over and over again. It's clearly your pet peeve to try to prove that science is based on faith just like theism. But it's not true of me or of science in general. You can call it "faith" if you want, but it's not. I know enough about quantum mechanics, Chaos Theory and String Theory to believe that the universe really is a collection of random material that happened to organize the way it has now. No, I can't personally replicate the experiments, but I can read them and they are enough for me to conclude that they are probably correct. Now, do I believe that those theories can be proven wrong? Of course it's possible and that's the great thing about science. We come up with hypothesis and theories and then ask people to try to disprove them and if they can, what they proved becomes the new theory or hypothesis.
So, I guess if you call that "faith" then you might be right by definition, but I don't think any theist is talking about that process of thinking when he says he believes by faith. By faith, I think a theist means that they don't require any evidence or proof other than what they feel and know in their hearts and minds. And, there is nothing that I believe in relation to science, or anything else for that matter, that I believe only because I feel it in my heart (whatever that means) or mind.