Evidence for God

You just gave a philosophical reply to a scientific question. My question was straightforward. Your answer was not. Don't try to minimize the validity of the question by calling it "cute" or using the term "retarTed" in your reply. I have seen it so many times: Atheists/Agnostics trying to paint the creationism worldview and it's proponents as uneducated or trite--resorting to personal attacks instead of just following the evidence wherever it leads. Hopefully a reasonable and sincere person can see through what they're doing. But it's fine if you can't answer the question. It only proves my point.

Well, that was a swing and a miss. And, btw, the characterization of nothing as something, in and of itself, vs the absence of something is hardly philosophical.

Anyway, I was enjoying Loopyness.