Why Are Americans Backing Off With The War on Terror?

FWIW, the generic "Democrat" doesn't work I suppose. I'm sure there are serious doves who would just as soon get out today. But that's not going to happen. This is from Dean's radio address today:


"Voters also made it clear that they want defense policies that are tough and smart. ... We will listen to the military, take their advice, and ensure that our troops and agencies have the tools and equipment they need to defend our freedom," he said. (Watch Dean talk about 'tough and smart' Democratic goals -- 3:30)
Several Democratic military veterans were among those elected, Dean said. Among them were Jim Webb of Virginia; Tim Walz of Minnesota; Phil Hare of Illinois; and retired Adm. Joe Sestak, Patrick Murphy and Chris Carney of Pennsylvania.
Veterans Day celebrates the armistice that ended World War I in 1918.
"Over the next two years, Democrats will lead with unified agenda that restores hope and opportunity, competence and responsibility," Dean said.
To better protect the nation, Democrats are committed, he said, to implementing the recommendations of the independent, bipartisan 9/11 commission.

Sounds like a reasonable policy. Trust the military to fight the wars (rather than idealogues), enact the recommendations of the commission, be smart and tough. Not bad IMHO, perhaps even a little more refined from what we've gotten out of the DoD.

TPS