Saints #2 Seed in NFC? or not.....

According to my logic, and what I know to be the tiebreaking procedures, the Saints should have moved up to the #2 seed in the NFC, even with the loss yesterday.

Heres why:

CHI 8-1 #1 Seed

NO 6-3 Conf 5-1 #2 Seed
SEA 6-3 Conf 5-2 #3 Seed
NYG 6-3 Conf 5-2 #4 Seed

HOWEVER, I sorted the conference standings on ESPN.com's standings page and got this: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/standings?season=2006&breakdown=2&split=0

They have Seattle at #2 and NO at #3. Can someone explain why they would win the tiebreaker? We havent played them head to head and i was close to 100% sure that the second tiebreaker in playoff seeding is record within the conference.


They've got to have it wrong. Seattle lost to Chicago and Miiny - two NFC teams. They'll probably correct it when they realize the mistake.

First tie breaker for conference is conference record.