NS.. ex-NFL players sue league... It's starting to make sense now

SaintsMed said

4. There is very little evidence to suggest that ALS is caused by trauma. There is some evidence to suggest that they may be linked. However, the literature that everyone is pulling from is a 12 person study, TWELVE people. Most had a certain protein (TDP-43) that is associated with the disease. 3 developed the disease or a disease similar. This disease is so rare that it will be a long time before great headway is made, and trying to tease out cause/effect is near impossible be sample size is so limited. I feel for Steve Gleason (he is on my computer and phone wallpaper) but I would be extremely pressed to suggest that his disease is caused by his NFL career.

Click to expand...

Actually, they believe football players are contracting ALS and an ALS-like disease, and that the protein they're finding on the spine is caused by repeated head trauma. I realize it's a reverse study, but it still shows that football players are significantly more likely to contract an ALS-like condition. Obviously, that does not rule out other factors, but it implies causation. Chronic encepalopathy has been linked pretty conclusively, and the brains of football players that have been studied have produced scary results.

http://www.bu.edu/today/2010/head-trauma-linked-to-als-like-disease/

Still, you make good points, and I mostly agree with them. I think there are a lot of people who have posted in this thread that are simply bitter that football players make so much money, and have a "they deserve whatever they get" mentality. I can't get on board with that. You're right that the science is not all there yet, but enough science is (and has been for some time) in place to mandate rule changes like the ones we are finally seeing and more. The fact that it took the NFL this long to react is where I think liability will attach, if not from simply being in the best position to discover these issues.