Jason Cole article: Brees - 3rd Franchise Tag? CBA Wording

Here's the article - <a href="http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=1141&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fsaintsreport.com%2Fforums%2Ff2%2Fssf-slacking-230908%2F&v=1&libid=1337970813836&out=http%3A%2F%2Fsports.yahoo.com%2Fnews%2Fnfl--saints-qb-drew-brees--contract-efforts-could-be-aided-by-language-in-cba.html%3B_ylt%3DAkvUQDY8UPiI69I0tOetphFDubYF&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fsaintsreport.com%2Fforums%2Ff2%2F&title=SSF%20Slacking%3F%20-%20SaintsReport%20Community%20Forums&txt=here%20it%20is&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13379710498463">Link</a>

Brees/Condon are arguing that the franchise tag next year would be a THIRD tender, worth 23.5 million. Basically there's your three million divide, and it's not going anywhere until someone rules on this dispute.

Here's the CBA, Op by SaintsW1n, <a href="http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=1141&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fsaintsreport.com%2Fforums%2Ff2%2Fssf-slacking-230908%2F&v=1&libid=1337970813836&out=http%3A%2F%2Fnfllabor.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fcollective-bargaining-agreement-2011-2020.pdf&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fsaintsreport.com%2Fforums%2Ff2%2F&title=SSF%20Slacking%3F%20-%20SaintsReport%20Community%20Forums&txt=here&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13379711433564">Link</a>

See page 44. Very vague wording:


Without a precedent who will interpret the spirit of the clause.... it is vague...IMO....
good post... makes sense to use it as leverage for the contract drew wants...the contract will be cheaper than the third tag cost especially with the bonus spread over the six years