I think it likely that a truly independent source would conclude that the wording has to do with a player being designated as a franchise player for the third time. It could have been more clear as to intent, however. If the Saints don't sign Drew by July 15, it is probably going to court.
What else will probably happen is that, since this is CLEARLY the second tag that has been applied to Drew, it will be argued that it CAN NOT BE AN EXCLUSIVE tag... Which I believe would be fair to both the Saints and Drew...