Ron Paul Poll Spamming Getting Out of Hand

Proof? You mean besides the guy on Digg calling for poll spamming and Wonkette saying one guy cast 5,000 votes?

75 ... 95 ... 98% support in online polls?

More online blog references than Paris Hilton?????

Gallup says...

Ron Paul
Jun 1-3, 2007 1%

http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=17785\

Yes, I've been to hacker-related websites in past elections where poll hacks were posted.

No, I haven't found such hacks regarding Ron Paul, mainly because I haven't looked and even if I found them, I can't post them here anyway without getting banned! :)

I just posted about that critical flaw that poll ALLLOWED OPENLLY with NO security ANYONE TO POST AS MANY TIMES AS THEY WANTED. there is no proof the man who did that 5000 posts did it through hacking and I guarantee you an Obama, Edwards or Romney fan has done the same dang thing. Plus if they actually CAUGHT him hacking at a freacking lowlevel blog, your gonna tell me they couldnt catch this guy on FOX? just becasue a person did that on a "vote as much as you want" poll, it DOESNT mean the mainstream polls were hacked. correlation doesnt equal causation.

You gallup poll doesnt work but i will say this beause I see the argument coming. The gallup polls ask about who you see as the person you want to vote for. The online polls asked about the debate and who won. A majority of Americans DONT watch the debates so to use a poll that is supposedlly repersentative of america doesnt mean anything. A majority of Americans HAVENT SEEN Ron Paul so of course gallup polls will have him low. That doesnt mean that those WHO ACTUALLY watched the debates didnt think he won. Your comparing apples to oranges and pretending the orange is an apple.