Mike Triplett on PFT Talk with Fioro, Monday at 4pm ET

The interview not available yet, and the transcripts of Vitt are very damaging....

Hmmm!!!!


Yeah I read some of Vitt's statements, and while I can see the diff between "trying to hurt guys with clean hits"... its still "paying if guys get hurt".

You give attorneys that kind of ammo and you're screwed.

I wear my black and gold glasses proudly but... when I read that Vitt said that... there was your "smoking gun" even if their "intent" was not to hurt them you're still paying guys to hurt them even with clean hits.

Here's what Vitt said... from the article on nola...

Vitt insisted that he never saw linebacker Jonathan Vilma or any other player offer a "bounty" on quarterbacks Brett Favre, Kurt Warner or any other opponent. But he did once again admit that Saints players were rewarded when they caused injuries to opponents through clean, legal hits.


According to Vitt, a "cart-off" hit meant the player had to be assisted off the field, and a "knockout" meant the player was literally knocked out.


Although Vitt tried to downplay those categories as minor injuries when a player needed smelling salts and returned quickly to the game, he did admit that season-ending injuries would also qualify. He was specifically asked about a season-ending shoulder injury suffered by Carolina Panthers quarterback Matt Moore on Nov. 7, 2010, which occurred after a legal sack by Saints defensive tackle Sedrick Ellis.


Vitt said he could not recall if a reward was specifically handed out for that play, but he said "they certainly could have been paid" if it was a legal, non-penalized hit.


Joe Vitt's anger, frustration and wit displayed in New Orleans Saints bounty appeals testimony | NOLA.com
Again... intent wasn't there but the fact that they were being paid if they hurt or knock folks out is why we've been going thru this whole mess.

We'll see what the PFT interview says..