So who's part of the 29%?

An individual's attitude towards a sitting president is much more indicative of the individual than the president.

Presidents cannot be judged in the moment. Presidents are privy to a whirlwind of information that influence their every waking moment.

It is impossible to accurately judge a sitting president, especially through the prism of an agenda driven media (as all media is now)

So teaching your children to despise a sitting president or teaching your children to glorify a sitting president is dangerous and only indicates a lack of understanding of the lessons of history.
I beg to differ, Gumbeau. We elect 'em (allegedly), we can judge and criticize their actions. Supposedly elected officials serve those who elect them. Yes in some cases, history may bear out that we were overly harsh in the moment, but I don't think that willl be the case with Bush