Scott Pioli's top 10 underclassman

I assume this is just on pure talent, in which case position doesn't matter. If he views Lacy as the 6th best TALENT then the fact that he's a RB is irrelevant. Now if this were how his draft board looked, yes, it'd be awful but in terms of talent evaluation I have no issue with a RB being up there despite the fact that we all know Lacy WON'T be the 6th underclassman taken cos his position has been devalued.

In fact you could see at least 3 QBs go before Lacy. Does that mean they are more talented (at their position) than Lacy? No chance. But it's still interesting to see a former GMs opinion, solely based on talent.