Mark Ingram 18 for 97 (5.4 ypc) 1 TD

And only Ingram gets to use the excuse that he doesn't get enough carries? You Ingram Apologists seem to use any excuse to forgive Ingrams very real poor performances but not give any one else any credit when they perform well. Why do you discount PTs accomplishments especially in the passing game. The Great PT has contributed to a hell of a lot more victories than Ingram has. Why weren't you calling for more carries for Thomas? Because you're man crush for MI has given you tunnel vision.

Why can't you just be a fan of one of the most valuable members on this team for the last 8 and be a fan of Ingram too? Because you have an agenda that doesn't allow for it. We PT Apologists, as you so insultingly put it, are fans because he's earned our appreciation.

I'm thrilled to see Ingram step up. It's been a long wait but it's looking like it was worth it. To suggest that because he's finally put some good games together we should now discard a still very productive veteran like an old shoe is ridiculous.


Nobody is an apologist for anybody...I'm one of the few people who get tired of hearing how one player is held to a standard the player being praised is succeptable to as well....pierre has a 3.9 yoc average this year...ingram haters would of made so many threads about that...all the backs are talented but some people just have to pretend that a bad cut is proof X player is not as good as Y player...or the fact X player got the goaline carry means Y player does not have the coaches trust...like anybody knows why for sure...just so much reaches to justify a player who is just as capable as another at his same position....you put yourself in category as a apologist...I'm a fan of the team and recognize how players are used and why they are used but all you see is criticism because you blindly argue anything that sounds like a knock against" your guy.