So Coleman is entitled to mark up someone else's property unapprovingly (under false pretenses) and then just shrug it off with an "It was a joke. lol" apology"?
Coleman is entitled to nothing besides enjoying himself. You are entitled to have your feelings hurt however you please or you can go enjoy yourself as well.
Coleman has constantly been compared to Colston, saying he is the next Colston, the second coming of Colston for the last year. He made a joke out of it. People can cry about it. Boo hoo. He apologized. He still enjoys his joke.
Go start a riot. Welcome to McDonalds, how may we offend you today? Would you like some cries with that?