Block in the back on Mauti

CajunSaint08 said
Not only that play, but on the first drive where Colston caught a 12 yard pass for a first that was negated due to penalty...two men in motion and did not come set prior to the snap....was a major missed call by the refs. I have replayed that play at least a dozen times and could not find two players in motion let alone not coming set prior to the snap. Theses penalties are so bogus.

And as for Watson's non-catch. If the NFL would just use common sense in making rules, these refs would make so much better calls. Watson not only caught the ball, placed two feet in bounds, placed both knees in bounds, and still had the sense to try and stretch for the first down marker, upon witch the ball touched the out of bounds marker and came loose. If that wasn't a catch, then nothing is.

2 feet down, then two knees down before reaching THEN losing the ball out of bounds.

Lets Common Sense here:
For a reception to be "in bounds" the receiving player must get two feet down in bounds.

For a player to be considered "down" he needs to have a knee, elbow, arm, or button touch the ground (and touched by another opposing player).
In other words, one knee, arm, or button is equal to two feet.

So, if Watson had two feet AND Two knees touch in bounds, by my math, that's equivalent to 6 feet.

The definition of a catch is 2 feet down and maintain control. OR more than two feet down.

This should've been a catch and fumble OOB at the least. Although, I think he also touched OOB before losing control. So that's just a completeion.