If you read between the lines he's actually suggesting that we could have more run oriented packages. For everyone complaining about the WR corps and how dynamic it's isnt, you could say being less pass oriented now makes more sense. If you were looking to air it out you wouldn't move away from Cooks and only replace him with Ginn and leave the rest of the WR corps untouched.
Just read the tea leaves. Signed a RB (replaced Hightower with an upgrade that has star power to boot), signed a big body run blocking guard (replaced an aging vetran big body run blocking guard with the best young, career right guard in FA that didn't cost as much as a star LT), drafted a RB (drafted a potential joker RB, a position the offense has been missing for a few years), drafted the #1 rated run blocking college lineman (drafted the player rated highest on our board by a ridiculous margin at #32, at a position that if not a need this year, will definitely be a need in the very near future. Also at one of the thinnest posistions on the roster), and traded cooks (traded the only player on your team who's production could be replaced and the only player with enough value to garner a 1st round pick that would allow your defense starved team to draft a QB with the #11 and still get a 1st round quality defensive player) . That kind of suggest a more balanced approach and yet Drew is still your QB so you will still inherently pass the ball more than you run...just hopefully that percentage is more balanced and not 63/37