Star Wars Stand Alone Films

That is pretty mindblowing, especially just a couple of years removed from TFA pulling in $2 billion. What's done is done, but for all the problems with TLJ I can't help but wonder, had they just listened to Mark Hamill and given Luke Skywalker a more satisfactory story, how different would the situation be today? Think about the Darth Vader scene in Rogue One -- literally like 15 seconds of pure fan service -- but how much did that one scene improve the movie? How much better would TLJ hold up if it just gave fans just a little bit of the Jedi master we'd been waiting 30 years to see, or at least not killed him off so you could hope to see him in episode IX? And how could no one see that would cause problems with the fan base?

Purely anecdotal, but the opening night crowd I saw TLJ with was very much with the movie until Luke's death. In fact, when it cuts from the fight between him and Kylo to show that he's still on Ahch-To and is force projecting an image, that got an audible cheer from the crowd. People were still very much into it. After he died? The entire mood of the theater changed. Some guy even punched a chair.

I think creators should work to make sure the things they're producing don't become complete fanservice. That gets bad really quickly (for example, the last season of Game of Thrones felt less like Martin's work and more like D&D checking off fanservice boxes. Some is fine, but too much is blah.), but at the same time I think Rian Johnson became so concerned with subverting expectations that he lost the forrest for the trees.

You just lost Han in The Force Awakens. People haven 't seen Luke doing Jedi things in over thirty years. We get teased with it and then its ripped away. Again, thematically I get what he's going for there. I have no problem with a disillusioned Luke wanting to throw in the towel, coming around on things, or even sacrificing himself for the greater good. In fact, on that last note I actually love the idea of him coming to realize that the "legend" of Luke Skywalker standing against the First Order is what will reignite the rebellion and see the Jedi reborn. Luke Skywalker as a symbol, as a legend can do more than real Luke Skywalker with a lightsaber could hope to. On paper, that's a pretty solid approach.

But it didn't feel earned. The entire story arc felt too rushed and compressed. And again, you've lost two major original trilogy characters in two movies. And while no one could foresee Carrie Fisher dying, that just compounds the issue. As much as I don't believe in all fanservice all the time, just asking yourself as the writer "Is killing off Han Solo and Luke Skywalker in back to back movies the best thing to do?" may be a smart move.

And yeah, force ghosts are a thing but it's not the same.