He makes the attempt to be objective and occasionally plays the role of contrarian and most Saints fans can't handle anyone who doesn't pump sunshine all day...
I'm going to say this as respectfully as I can: this is a garbage take.
There was absolutely nothing "objective" about how Duncan behaved during that fiasco. It was personal, it was emotional, and it was against all the facts. If you want objective journalism, how about the Wall Street Journal analysis that showed the Saints caused the second fewest number of injuries during the time of the "bounty" program?