The overturned OPI on review was a very succinct and direct injustice from the NFL to New Orleans.

gtaz21 said
Your point is nonsensical. It's like blaming the gun for a murder. A rule is only as good as its enforcement. The ability to challenge PI calls is a good thing. It gives power to the teams to correct a wrong judgment call based on video evidence so that the NFL can't mistakenly put the WRONG TEAM in the Super Bowl again. This HOPE presupposes that the NFL WANTS TO GET IT RIGHT. I, for one, am certain that they do NOT WANT TO GET IT RIGHT. They want as many judgment calls as they can get so that they CAN CONTROL the outcomes of games especially which teams get into the biggest TV event of the year.

The rule is great. The people running the NFL are aholes.

I am not saying righting a wrong is a bad thing, I’m just saying that situations like what happened today are just a different form of the same problem.

I do not believe there is a conspiracy to control the outcome of games, I find that nonsensical. In this age of leaks, hacks and incompetence, I don’t believe these people have the ability to orchestrate this type of operation in secret. Especially if only to protect a part time job. I could be wrong, hope I’m not. I would never watch again if I believed that.