Not idiotic or lazy thinking on my part at all. You said:
From the time that Tom Benson bought the Saints, the organization has had ties, in some way, to the Archdiocese. This is, by your own words, inexcusable.
Put differently:
1. Does the organization have "any ties, in any way, to the Archdiocese"? Yes.
2. Is the fact that the organization has "any ties, in any way, to the Archdiocese," in your own words, "absolutely inexcusable"? Yes.
3. If the ties are "absolutely inexcusable," and therefore you absolutely cannot excuse them, then it would be logically and morally inconsistent for you to support the organization. In order for you to support the organization, you'd have to excuse the very thing that you expressly deemed to be "absolutely inexcusable."
Whether you believe in fairy tales from an old book is irrelevant. I never said it was relevant. You injected religion, as such, into the discussion. My only point was to demonstrate the illogic of your post.