I'll just say they are involved in actually sending the data to CDC. Now it's anecdotal in the sense that they're aware of the real numbers in their area are twice what the CDC is reporting. Maybe it's only happening with them, but I suspect they're hardly the only ones. I've never really trusted the numbers for the most part. I think they're intentionally keeping the numbers low so as to avoid starting a panic. Which is understandable.
And fwiw, I'm sure some will be skeptical, and that's fine. I was until I spoke with them. I still have questions, but it's hard to verify the data being made public.