Just can't envison Wide Reciever not being BPA at #24 in almost any scenario.

NOFALCONS10 said

In 2009 our 3 top wrs had over 700 receiving yards but I get what you are saying. We lost Ginn and Kirkwood and outside of our top two guys the position is still pretty shaky.

They did target a LB (Jamie Collins) but missed out so an inside lb definitely might still be in play.

I just worry that Queen and Murray

1) aren't as talented
2)arent as big as a drop off from Logan Wilson in rd 3 as it is from top rd 1 wrs to rd 3 wrs.

Click to expand...

But, I guess the question is whether the drop off at LB is just as steep or steeper than the drop of at WR in the 3rd round. And, I think both positions are at similar levels of need, although LB is probably a bigger need because our starters at WR are better than our starters at LB, and our starting LBs have many more injury concerns than the starting WRs.

I'm all for BPA, but I think part of that equation is that all things being close to equal in talent, you have to next look at need and what the drop off is to the next few players at that position will be.