True, but the point is that wet markets not all that different from the ones in China are all over the world and are just as likely to result in the same thing happening. If the Chinese were guilty of being negligent in allowing them so is most of the rest of the world.
So what is your point? Any wet market that poses a public health hazard due to cross species viral infection needs to be shut down, whether it’s in China, CA, NY, or any country in the world.
Should the number one goal not be to minimize the risk of this happening again?