I also want to point out that how likely is it that someone was able to find a bat coranavirus that had significant homology rather quickly unless it had already been identified and that particular coronavirus was already sequenced? Same thing with the pangolin.
How likely is it that they randomly started looking for coronaviruses in the wild and ran across a "new" bat coronavirus in a couple of months? Even less likely someone would decide to test a pangolin for a coronavirus and then miraculously found it would be 99% similar to Sars 2.
These had to be known coronaviruses to have those sequences to even compare them.
The big question is were either of these similar reservoir coronaviruses used in gain of function research?