gregh
The Real Deal
Offline
lwell thats 2 different national anthems being played so...Why on earth would this bother anyone? When American and Canadian teams play each other they play both anthems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
lwell thats 2 different national anthems being played so...Why on earth would this bother anyone? When American and Canadian teams play each other they play both anthems.
For me personally as a black American I don't want special treatment like this. Do we need to have an Anthem for every race that's in America? One Anthem shows we're United under one flag one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. This "woke" attempt is a weak attempt to have people buy into a cause that is polluted with politics. This is causing more division than it is helping at all.
yea and people like Biden were against bringing everyone together. i think his exact words in front of congress was he didnt want his kids to go to school in an "urban jungle". what a sick man..
yea and people like Biden were against bringing everyone together. i think his exact words in front of congress was he didnt want his kids to go to school in an "urban jungle". what a sick man..
I get that we are protesting the overreach of police in this country and everything but why in the heck is the NFL getting involved in politics?
Do they realize that this is not a friendly gesture to black individuals but a divisive one? The Star Spangled Banner is already the NATIONAL ANTHEM for all Americans. Last time I checked, black Americans are AMERICANS.
By doing this, it totally justifies the question: What about an asian national anthem, or a native american rain dance (for the redskins), or even.... a white national anthem. Imagine that.
Do we really want to sow actual segregation in this country? Am I losing my mind or is this country actually becoming MORE segregated?!
AND THERE WILL BE NO FANS IN THE STANDS TO SEE IT!https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...hem-lift-every-voice-sing-openers/5368762002/
Before every Week 1 kickoff.
Lift Every Voice and Sing was first written as a poem and created by James Weldon Johnson. The poem was set to music by Johnson's brother, John Rosamond Johnson, and adopted by the NAACP as its official song.
They're also planning:
Something is only bait, in the eyes of those that perceive something specifically as such. Your call.
Thanks for the mansplain. I'll just let the gentleman speak for himself.
It is another country’s national anthem and is played in a reciprocal way, as the Canadians do for the U.S. anthem. So what about all other anthems? Black anthem? What country is that? It is specific to a RACE, not a country and pure stupidity by Goodell! He is doing an excellent job of creating more divisiveness. Imagine IF the stadiums were full of fans what the outcome would be. Most whites and many non blacks, would sit for the black anthem and the majority of blacks would sit for the national anthem. So what did Goodell do?lwell thats 2 different national anthems being played so...
Something is only bait, in the eyes of those that perceive something specifically as such. Your call.
This, (playing Lift every voice and sing for the first week) is not special treatment. This is condescension.For me personally as a black American I don't want special treatment like this.
We don't. Lift Every Voice and Sing was first called the Negro National Anthem by the NAACP because of its " power in voicing a cry for liberation and affirmation for African-American people. Some of the words of poem that the national anthem is based on don't sit well with some of us.Do we need to have an Anthem for every race that's in America?
I agree that one anthem can show all those things but lets not kid ourselves. If you are talking about the wrong "God" as in Allah you are going to run into some resistance. Liberty and justice FOR ALL is exactly why the players were protesting in the first place. I mean even in 2020, Barack Obama, one of the most popular politicians and presidents in recent history is still just a n-word to some people in this country.One Anthem shows we're United under one flag one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
Why do you think that the protests (I'm not going to even call it the BLM movement because it's bigger than just Black lives at this point) are polluted with politics? This isn't about politics. This is about justice. This movement is about holding America accountable for what it claims to be. Do you care to elaborate on why you believe it to be polluted with politics?This "woke" attempt is a weak attempt to have people buy into a cause that is polluted with politics.
By "This" I take it that you mean the NFL's face flop stunt to play Lift Every Voice and Sing for the first week.This is causing more division than it is helping at all.
Just stop. I'm not going to debate what you meant, what I meant, or whether we understood each other. I'm going to let the man's words speak for themselves.My response had nothing to do with you being a woman and I really only noticed who posted it when you responded. It was a polite response that pointed out that cherry picking a few people who disagree with something, and then assuming that everyone of their race agrees with it, is illogical and may not reflect reality. Moreover it's the kind of dangerous stereotyping that contributed to the types of things discussed by BLM. Why you think the fact that one man, who happens to be black, thinks you can have equality in the face of "separate but equal" is beyond me. And, you said it was "African American people" and that's just one guy.
But, I mean, if you disagree with my reasoning, feel free to mansplain to me why I'm wrong.
Something is only bait, in the eyes of those that perceive something specifically as such. Your call.
Black people, like white people, are not monolithic. Some of us see the BLM one way and then some of us see it another way and I think that might be based on the way we've experienced being black in America. Or maybe because we have yet to really experienced being black in America. Me personally, I experienced it at a young age. Being both arrogant and naive, I thought I could protect my son from it until later in life. Sadly, he experienced it at an even earlier age than myself. I'm actually quite happy for those folks who have yet to truly experience their blackness. It's something when you do.There were many African Americans during the 1960s that called MLK a trouble maker. Said he was only dividing the country further and stoking more racial tension. Said the best way was quietly through the court system.
Which would have achieved civil rights on its own right about now? Maybe?
Very wise those people were.
You facepalm me because I want to direct away from having an ad hominem argument with you regarding what a third person said rather than focusing on the verbatim words of that person? Okay.