If the refs aren’t overwhelmingly biased against the Saints, please explain this:
It ends with the bias conclusion, which is where we have been, and blemms walked you through of how you can "cultivate" bias if you choose to.
Going the data route, this all reminds me again of bounty gate again when the league and media narrative was the Saints were a dirty organization paying players to intentionally injure opponents. Except that they weren't very good.
The data showed that the Saints were near the bottom of the league in causing injuries to opponents, let alone knocking them out of games. If you were paying big incentives to play recklessly, that is not an outcome you would expect.