Formula One

superchuck500 said

That's crazy. I suppose they consider retiring the car before the system actually fails because it's a safety issue for the driver (and other drivers) if the car is suddenly without power? Or because full failure may damage the whole power unit ($$$) beyond repair?

That's one thing fendered cars can do - run it til it lets go, you don't have the same concerns.

Click to expand...

Excellent questions. Perhaps it depends on the nature of the expected failure - I'm not sure what it was. Could be that it could start a fire, explode, spew oil all over the track, or maybe simply shut off. Was worth it for the win though, I think ... though I also expect they were not intending to salvage the PU. Half the grid had new engines this weekend, and I think they're allowed what ... 4 for the year? I think RB were going to replace it after this race.


I mused this weekend if having tired engines helped Red Bull to not overdo it in the corners in qualifying so much, but that kind of seems ridiculous.

We certainly saw the improved raw power from the new Merc units ... they topped out at 207 on the straights with DRS over the weekend, while Red Bull could only manage about 203. I'm not sure why the Ferrari was so easily passed during the race.