It’s the opposite of Qanon, and here’s why:
In Qanon, the Q people come up with an outlandish theory, and then create and imagine complicated evidence and patterns as to why it’s real.
When examining fraud in the financial markets (financial markets which, btw, crashed in devestating fashion only 13 years ago due to fraud), the people are finding evidence and data points first and trying to draw the most efficient, least-complicated solution they can from them.
For example, BTC very frequently takes big dips right before GME has a big rise in price. It’s now twice in the last month that BTC’s price nosedives before a beginning of week parabolic bull run on GME.
If BTC drops straight down right before GME rises straight up, it’s only logical to hypothesize that perhaps BTC is being sold to either cover short GME positions or to facilitate its re-shorting.
The internet retail traders are making impartial observations first, drawing possible conclusions second, and doing so in the most efficient and occam’s razor-mindful way they can.