Anything Over 6 or 7 wins with Winston at Qb would be considered a win

jahsoul357 said
And? That's just the point that I was making. There was friction.

It doesn't prove your claim that Brady threw picks left and right.

jahsoul357 said
Funny enough, let's look at end of the article

"Brady is going to fight to get this right until he runs out of time. But the Bucs, and especially Leftwich, need to do a better job of collaborating with their quarterback."

In other words, let's finally adapt this playbook to Tom's strengths. They still kept some elements but also began to add more play-action, motion, etc.

Sure, still, doesn't prove your claim that Brady threw picks left and right.

jahsoul357 said
And that means what?

It'd think it very obvious that it means Brady played against better secondaries the 4 games before the bye and poor secondaries after.

jahsoul357 said
But I am.

No you are not.

jahsoul357 said
You made an excuse as to why Brady threw 7 interceptions over a 4 game span, in which he threw interceptions left and right (if you want to go back and look at some of those bad passes).

I didn't make an excuse. It is very simple: when QBs play against better teams with good secondaries, chances are they will suffer more interceptions. The Saints (18 INTs, which BTW in 2 games accounted for 42% of Brady's 12 INT's) and the Chiefs (16 INTs), that's #1 and #2 in INTs last year. The Rams got 14 INTs. "Coincidentally", the other team in that 4 game span, the Panthers, who didn't get a pick, only picked 7 balls all season.

You say Brady threw picks left and right in those 4 games because of Arians' system. What then happened the previous 8 games in which Brady only threw 4 INTs (2 of them in 1 game to the Saints)? Was he not playing in Arians' system? Was there another system?

jahsoul357 said
I just said the other person didn't get the benefit of excuses. That's all.

What does "the other person" have to do with anything? Yet again, I am not talking about anyone else.