Pre-season stats are irrelevant here as the argument was whether or not the QB competition was neck & neck and by Nick Underhill's and every other reporter's stance, it was for a rather considerable amount of time. I said previously here in this thread that Winston started to first pull away in pre-season and locked it up with his performance against the Jaguars. All the pre-season stats do is help support that.
So you want to Taysom supporters to stay consistent but you, as a Winston supporter, don't want to have to apply that to yourself. No surprise there. This type of hypocrisy has become all too prevalent. I foresee a lot of childish back and forth arguing should Taysom get named the starter.
Taysom throws a ball up for grabs that the Saints come down with...
Jameis supporters: Okay, Taysom lovers, criticize that like you did when Jameis made a play like that.
Taysom supporters: Okay, Jameis lovers, defend that like you did when Jameis made a throw like that.
Jameis supporters: Well, y'all go first.
Taysom supporters: No, y'all go first.
Everyone agreed that naming Winston the starter was the right call and that he won the job fair and square. That doesn't mean you can't root for Taysom to come in and light it up. It also doesn't mean you can't/shouldn't stay consistent with evaluating the QB's performance.
LOL. I think I recognize that gif. Is that Gary Payton reacting to a Jordan Kilganon dunk?