Hill vs Siemian why is there a debate?

Saintamaniac said

I disagree. Maybe you missed the whole thread about Hill should request a trade and that the QB competition was unfair to Hill. Not everyone agreed that naming Winston the starter was the right call and definitely not everyone thought he won the job fair and sqare

I never said I wasn't going to root for Hill to light it up. I simply said I won't accept bad Oline play or WR's not getting open as an excuse if Hill struggles to maintain or improve the offensive performance.

Oh I plan to be as consistent as the crowd that has been critical of Winston these first 6 games have been.

Click to expand...

I'll take the hit on that first part because I do remember that reaction to Hill. But I meant "everyone" in more of an overwhelming general consensus concept though.

That's just the type of hypocrisy I am talking about. Jameis supporters want to hold Taysom supporters to task over being as critical with Taysom as they were with Jameis, but Jameis supporters don't want to be held to task of explaining away things for Taysom like they did for Jameis. Your saying, "I'm going to act like Taysom supporters by not allowing excuses" is no different that a Taysom supporter saying, "I'm going to act like Jameis supporters and excuse away every bad thing of Taysom under the sun."