Hill vs Siemian why is there a debate?

BoxerJoe said

I am just trying to get you to acknowledge that just as you can use the hypercritical postings about Jameis as a guide for speaking out about Taysom, so, too, can someone use the hyper-defensive postings about Jameis as a guide for speaking out about Taysom; and that neither side would have the moral high ground there.

Click to expand...

Let me be clear that I am not in search of any moral high ground. I think the people who were overly critical of Winston were wrong. I think most of it comes from feeling that Hill should be the starter. Now that Hill may be the starter, I will see if those same people are critical of Hill in the same manner that they were with Winston.

14 TD's, 3 interceptions and 1 fumble with a 4-2 record in 6 games. That's the baseline. Similar or better results indicate I was wrong. Anything below the baseline indicates I wasn't.

The difference is I will be critical of Hill based on his performance, not by his history.