I will be looking to see if those folks STILL believe that it to be okay of Hill without taking that into consideration or if they magically have an epiphany and realize that it's not right to not take those into consideration.
This seems to be the crux of all of your posts on this subject. You are flat out saying that you are going to be watching posters and keeping track of who says what regarding Hill and compare it to what they said about Winston.
What's the point of taking names of who said what? What do you plan on doing with those names and what they said? How can this in any way be beneficial to any discussion?