You're arguing against taking continuing actions against the pandemic, such as vaccinating children, on the grounds that you think most of the people in hospitals on ventilators have underlying issues, and that most of the people who are dying are 50 and above.
The clear implication is that those people being on ventilators and those people dying is acceptable, and no further measures, such as vaccinating children, should be taken to help reduce those numbers.
But perhaps you don't think that. Perhaps you just don't comprehend that vaccination reduces spread, both since vaccination reduces chances of infection (can't spread infection if you're not infected in the first place), and by potentially reducing viral load and duration of infectiousness.
Or perhaps you don't understand that an individual's risk is a combination of factors: their risk of exposure, their own vaccination status, their underlying base risk due to age, conditions, genetics, etc. And maybe not realising that, you also don't realise that mass vaccination, including of children, reduce's everyone's risk of exposure. So perhaps you don't realise that vaccinating people protects others as well as them.
And you clearly don't seem to realise that even ignoring all that, in a pandemic with a high risk of exposure, vaccination represents a reduction of risk on a purely individual basis, even for children.
So if you want to clarify whether you just don't particularly care about people with underlying issues or people over 50, or whether you were simply ignorant about the benefits of vaccination both on an individual and on a collective basis, feel free.